beer, tap, pour, brew, alcohol, drink, bartender, keg, bartender, bartender, bartender, bartender, bartender. Brewery and taproom pricing: cost-per-pour formulas
Photo by StockSnap on Pixabay

Guides

Brewery and taproom pricing: cost-per-pour formulas

A brewery and taproom pricing framework with formulas for beer, labor, and fixed cost per pour, contribution per staffed hour, and channel economics.

What to take away

  • Build brewery and taproom pricing from the pour, not just the beer. The liquid is usually the smallest part of what a glass costs you.
  • Labor is not a fixed overhead in this business. It is a variable that moves with hours open, and it belongs inside the price of a pint.
  • Work the arithmetic in your own named quantities. Any margin figure quoted from another operation was measured on that operation's rent, wages and tap layout.
  • The same beer sold through four channels—draft in the taproom, packaged to go, self-distribution, and wholesale—has different costs to serve and different answers.
  • The number to watch is contribution per staffed hour, not margin per glass. Margin per glass on an empty Tuesday is a fiction.

Why one price answer cannot exist

A brewery with a taproom sells the same liquid through channels with wildly different cost structures. In the glass, you carry the room, the staff, the glassware and the license. In a can through a distributor, you carry packaging and a discount and almost none of the room. The beer is identical. The economics are not.

On top of that, the two largest inputs to a pour are set locally. Rent is set by your address, and wages are set by your labor market and your state's rules. Neither is something a national figure can stand in for. Anyone who tells you what percentage of your price should be labor is telling you about their building.

What does generalize is the method. Build the price from named quantities you can measure, keep the channels separate, and check the answer against the constraint that actually limits you.

Building the cost of a pour

Define these for your own operation. Use your numbers, from your own records, for a recent and normal period.

Cost of one pour

  • C ÷ (V×128 ÷ G) ÷ Ybeer cost per pour
  • L ÷ Nlabor per pour
  • F ÷ Nfixed cost per pour
  • Sum of threecost before profit
  • Vis the stated volume of the keg, in gallons.
  • Gis your standard pour, in fluid ounces. One gallon is 128 fluid ounces, so the theoretical pours per keg are V times 128, divided by G.
  • Yis your realized yield: the pours actually sold from a keg, divided by the theoretical pours. It is always below one, and measuring it is the single most useful thing on this page.
  • Cis the fully loaded cost of the beer in that keg: ingredients, packaging materials, utilities for the brew and the cellar, and the production labor that made it.
  • Lis your taproom labor cost for an hour, including the payroll burden that sits on top of the wage.
  • Nis the number of pours you actually sell in that hour.
  • Fis your fixed cost for the hour: rent, insurance, utilities for the room, and the salaried time that is there whether or not anybody comes in.

Now the cost of one pour is:

Beer cost per pour = C divided by (V times 128 divided by G) divided by Y

Labor per pour = L divided by N

Fixed cost per pour = F divided by N

Add those three and you have what the glass costs you before you have made anything. The second and third terms matter most because they contain N.

As the room empties, the cost of every glass you sell rises, and it rises fast. That is the arithmetic behind the feeling that quiet nights are worse than they look.

Two consequences follow. First, yield is worth real money: the divisor Y sits under the whole beer cost, so a small improvement in what reaches a glass moves every pour you sell. Second, hours are a pricing decision, not just a schedule decision, because opening an hour that cannot reach a workable N loads cost onto every glass in it.

Labor as a share of the pour

Most operators think of labor as an overhead line reviewed monthly. In a taproom it behaves more like an ingredient with a variable quantity.

Labor per pour by hour

  • Peak FridayN high, term small
  • Slow TuesdayN low, term large

Take the labor per pour term and look at it across your week. On a peak Friday, N is high and the term is small. On a slow Tuesday, N is low and the term can exceed the beer cost several times over. Same wage, same beer, completely different economics per glass.

The useful measure is contribution per staffed hour. For each hour open, take revenue, subtract beer cost of what was sold and labor cost of people on shift. That number tells you whether the hour earned its keep.

Do that for four weeks. You will have a map of your business that no margin percentage can give you.

You will find three kinds of hours: hours that clearly pay, hours close to break even that exist to keep the room open and the regulars served, and hours that lose money every week.

The third category is a decision. It is not a mystery. Change the staffing, change the hour, or accept the loss deliberately as the cost of being a neighborhood fixture.

Some front of house roles are tipped and some are not, which changes what an hour costs you and what the person earns.

Treat tipped and non tipped labor as separate inputs in this arithmetic, not one blended rate. The tip provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act apply to tipped roles in this business, and they are set out in Fact Sheet #15 from the U.S. Department of Labor. Confirm how your state treats a tipped rate before you build a model on it.

Channels priced separately

What you carry

Draft in the taproom
Room, staff, glassware, license
Packaged to go from the taproom
Packaging materials and the fill labor
Self distribution
Delivery time, invoicing, collections
Wholesale
Packaging only

What you give up

Draft in the taproom
Nothing to a middleman
Packaged to go from the taproom
Little
Self distribution
Retail markup
Wholesale
Both the wholesale and retail markups

What the price has to cover

Draft in the taproom
Beer, labor per pour, fixed cost per pour
Packaged to go from the taproom
Beer, packaging, the counter time to sell it
Self distribution
Beer, packaging, delivery labor, credit risk
Wholesale
Beer, packaging, and a much thinner remainder

The point of the table is that these are four businesses. A price that works in the glass tells you nothing about whether a wholesale relationship is worth having, and an operator who blends them into one margin number cannot see which one is subsidizing the others.

Four channels, four businesses

Draft in taproom

What you carry
Room, staff, glassware
What you give up
Nothing to middleman
Price must cover
Beer, labor, fixed cost

Packaged to go

What you carry
Packaging, fill labor
What you give up
Little
Price must cover
Beer, packaging, counter time

Self distribution

What you carry
Delivery, invoicing
What you give up
Retail markup
Price must cover
Beer, packaging, delivery, credit risk

Wholesale

What you carry
Packaging only
What you give up
Wholesale and retail markup
Price must cover
Beer, packaging, thin remainder

Which of these channels are even open to you is a licensing question rather than a commercial one, so settle what your license permits you to sell before you model any of them. In California, a person who wants an alcoholic beverage license applies at the nearest district office of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, and other states issue their own permits through a state alcohol control board.

The constraint that sets the real answer

Every operation has one thing that limits sellable output. Find yours and measure contribution against it.

Find your real constraint

What limits sellable output?

Yes

Fermenters full -> contribution per barrel

No

Beer and empty seats -> contribution per staffed hour

If your fermenters are full and you sell everything you make, beer is the constraint, and the right question is contribution per barrel.

If you have beer and empty seats, the room is the constraint, and the right question is contribution per staffed hour.

If you turn people away at the door on your best nights, occupancy is the constraint. It was fixed by the site you chose and cannot be repriced.

Optimizing against the wrong constraint is the most expensive mistake in this section. Raising prices to improve margin per barrel when your problem is an empty room will make the room emptier.

What to check before you change a price

  • What is the current contribution per staffed hour, by day and by hour?
  • Which products carry the most labor per dollar of revenue? That belongs with the draft and packaged lineup rather than with the price list.
  • Has yield changed? A price rise that is really a yield problem will not fix the yield.
  • What have input costs done since the last change, and can you show that from records rather than memory?
  • Who explains the new price to guests, and have they been told first?

The last point costs nothing and prevents most of the damage. A price change explained badly at the bar reads as opportunism. Explained plainly by someone who knows why, it usually passes without comment.

Before changing a price

  • Contribution per staffed hour, by day and hour
  • Products with most labor per revenue dollar
  • Has yield changed?
  • Input costs since last change, from records
  • Who explains the price, told first

Records, claims and the paper trail

Your cost figures are only as good as the records behind them. The Internal Revenue Service: What kind of records should I keep? guidance is that a business chooses its own system as long as it clearly shows income and expenses and keeps the documents that support them.

For pricing, that means your ingredient costs, your labor hours, your keg counts and your sales exports have to be reconcilable, because every term in the arithmetic above comes out of one of them.

Anything you say about the price in public is advertising. Federal Trade Commission: Advertising FAQs: A Guide for Small Business sets out that claims must be truthful and substantiated.

A promotion described as a discount from a price nobody paid is the classic failure, and it is easy to fall into when a price change and a promotion overlap.

For the labor side of the model, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics: Food Service Managers profile describes what management in this kind of operation actually covers, including budgets, payroll records and scheduling. Use it to see which of those hours are genuinely fixed and which move with your opening pattern.

For the general business framing around finance, insurance and growth, the U.S. Small Business Administration: SBA Business Guide covers the ground that is not specific to alcohol, and pairs naturally with the wider startup and market picture.

What to hand to a professional

The wage and hour treatment of tipped roles, excise obligations, and the structure of any distribution agreement are all worth paid advice. The federal excise tax on beer and the brewery permit sit with the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, while the license to pour comes from your state alcohol control board, so a model that stops at ingredient and room cost is missing a line the government already has. So is a review of your cost model by an accountant who has seen other operations, because the most common error is not arithmetic. It is leaving something out.

Common questions

What margin should a taproom make on a pint?

No honest page can tell you. The three largest inputs, rent, wages and yield, are all local to your building, and a figure quoted without them describes a business you do not run. Build the arithmetic above with your own numbers and you will have an answer that is actually yours.

Should the taproom pay the brewery for beer?

Internally, yes, at a transfer cost that reflects what the beer actually cost to make. Otherwise the taproom looks brilliant and production looks like a cost center, and you will make bad decisions about both. Keep it as an internal accounting convention and ask your accountant how it should appear in the books.

Is it better to raise prices or cut hours?

They solve different problems. Raising prices helps when the room is full and the margin is thin. Cutting hours helps when specific hours lose money every week. Look at contribution per staffed hour and the answer usually picks itself.

How often should prices be reviewed?

Review the underlying costs on a regular schedule and change the price when the review says so, rather than on an annual habit. Ingredient and packaging costs move at their own pace, and a review that finds no reason to change is still a useful review.

Do flights and tasters need their own price logic?

Yes. A flight is several pours, several glasses and much more bartender time than a single pint. Run the same arithmetic with G set to the taster size and N reduced for the extra service time, and the answer often surprises people.

More in Guides

Latest from Policy Desk